That factual place cannot just be wished away as some interests are demanding his removal from the ballot,” he declared.
PSN accused unnamed political interests of being unsettled by what it described as Chinda’s growing political profile in Rivers and alleged that some opponents were determined to block his emergence.
The group said it believed Nigerians should be allowed to judge candidates by method of the electoral analyze rather than using what it described as repeated attempts to manufacture legal controversies on their candidacies.
“We are concerned that those who are uncomfortable alongside Hon. Chinda’s rising political profile and those who do not wish for to see Rivers Status make construct are now attempting to manufacture a disqualification narrative adjacent to his candidacy. The Rivers APC has stated that he became a associate of the party 24 days prior to the primary, during the time that the functional necessity is 21 days. Kingsley Chinda’s emergence, but whether the legal requirements governing his nomination were satisfied. Political disagreements are lawful, but they should not be converted into legal claims minus a solid factual and legal base,” Idoko said.
PSN too urged INEC to assert neutrality and permit the courts to recognize any correct legal dispute arising from the nomination analyze.
It said the Supreme Court’s restoration of sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2) of the Electoral Act 2026 did not, by itself, figure to a judicial assertion that Chinda was disqualified from contesting the Rivers governorship election.
“The electoral procedure must be defended from unnecessary disruption. Chinda’s candidacy should be determined by the law and the founded electoral process,” Idoko said.
The Parliament Support Network (PSN) has dismissed calls for the disqualification of Kingsley Chinda, the All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship candidate in Rivers declare.
It described the campaign against his candidacy as a politically motivated bid to derail his participation in the 2027 election.
In a declaration on Tuesday signed by its Statewide President, Maxwell Idoko, the collection said recent attempts to reopen questions roughly Chinda’s nomination should not be allowed to obscure what it described as the candidate’s compliance alongside the functional electoral requirements.
The state followed a inquire by the Tie of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP) asking the Self-satisfactory Statewide Electoral Commission (INEC) to disqualify Chinda following remain week’s Supreme Court judgment on provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 relating to political party membership registers and candidate nomination.
PSN said the Supreme Court judgment should be applied according to its authentic legal effect rather than used as a reason for creating a recent dispute over Chinda’s candidacy.
“The endeavor to manufacture a disqualification where none has been settled is, in our perspective, a distraction from the substance of the Supreme Court’s decision. Hon. Nigerians deserve to see the law applied objectively and consistently, rather than having every political development turned into an excuse to reopen a settled nomination procedure,” Idoko said.
The fixed additionally cited the outlook of the Rivers APC, which has maintained that Chinda registered using the party 24 days ahead of the governorship principal, exceeding the 21-day period referenced in the interpretation of the restored provisions.
Idoko noted that those seeking Chinda’s disqualification had failed to establish, on the publicly accessible facts, that the Supreme Court judgment automatically invalidated his nomination.
“The applicable query is not whether some individuals are uncomfortable using Hon. If anyone has a authentic legal objection, the fitting thing is to present the evidence ahead of the competent court rather than bid to create a disqualification by community pressure.
Source: Rivers 2027: 'Supreme Court Ruling Doesn’t Disqualify Chinda'
