Our solution will carry on to be constitutional, peaceful and lawful,” the group said.
The Kwankwasiyya Movement has accused the Kano Declare Government of intimidating and harassing critics and opposition supporters in the status.
Naija News reports that the movement made the allegations in a declaration issued Wednesday by its spokesperson, Habibu Sale Mohammed, in reply to an Amnesty Multinational describe on alleged arrests, detention, and harassment of critics of the Kano government.
Kwankwasiyya, nonetheless, vowed to request legal redress over the alleged violations.
The movement said the situation supported concerns it had previously raised on what it described as a shrinking democratic space in the declare.
It alleged that different society had been affected by the reported arrests and intimidation, including Abba Ibrahim Kofar Nasarawa, popularly established as Aiha K Nass; Murtala Muhammad Dawanau; Fatima Dayyabu; Maryam Usman, too established as Golden Queen; Muhammad Ahmad; Hafsat Muhammad Sauwama Kauwama; Khadija Garba Kadnass; Ismail Hassan Hussain Lajin Dala; and Isa Zanna Isa.
The staff additionally said Amnesty Multinational had raised concerns over alleged threats against Zaidu Magaji.
The movement notably expressed consideration over the continued detention of Aiha K Nass, who it said had been arrested and brought ahead of a Sharia court.
“The initial bail application was refused but was later granted under stringent conditions, including a circumstance to provide two serving permanent secretaries and a Kano Situation Government employee as sureties,” the category said.
The Kwankwasiyya Movement said it had petitioned the Director Judge of Kano Condition and the Kano Status Judicial Solution Commission over the conduct and circumstances of proceedings ahead of the Sharia Court, Ungogo Division.
It said the decision to request institutional intervention aimed to receive a critique of the material by method of lawful channels.
“We await the petition to gain reasonable and impartial detail, including appropriate measure taken if any wrongdoing or procedural violation is identified,” the movement said.
It too warned that it would continue to employ legal and constitutional avenues to challenge what it considers violations of its members’ and other citizens’ rights.
“We will not respond to intimidation including violence. We will not assist our members to take the law into their own hands,” the expression said.
It continued urged the judiciary to protected its independence and guarantee that citizens appearing earlier than the courts acquire impartial and impartial treatment.
“Let nobody provoke us into abandoning the path of law.
